Blog · Advertising & SMEs
One captures customers already looking for you. The other goes and finds the ones who don't know you yet. Here is how to decide.
It's the question almost every small business in Greater Vancouver asks me when it's time to advertise: "Should I put my money on Google or on Facebook?" The honest answer isn't "one is better than the other". It's that the two platforms serve two different moments in the customer journey. Knowing which one matches your situation already saves you half the budget.
Google Ads runs on intent. Someone types "bilingual accountant Greater Vancouver" or "roof repair Coquitlam", and your ad shows up at the exact moment the need exists. You don't create the desire, you capture it. This is demand that is already warm.
Meta Ads (Facebook and Instagram) runs on relevant interruption. Nobody opens Instagram to buy. Your ads appear while people scroll their feed, based on their interests and behaviours. You create demand, you put your offer in front of people who weren't looking for you, but who might be interested.
Put simply: Google harvests, Meta plants. And depending on what you sell, you don't need both from day one.
| Google Ads | Meta Ads (Facebook / Instagram) | |
|---|---|---|
| Logic | Capture existing demand | Create demand, drive discovery |
| Customer intent | High (actively searching) | Low to medium (browsing) |
| Indicative cost per click | About 5 USD on average | About 0.70 to 1.90 USD |
| Winning format | Text search, keywords | Visual, video, carousel |
| Best for | Searched services, urgent needs, B2B | Visual products, launches, awareness |
The cost-per-click figures above are indicative, in US dollars, drawn from WordStream's 2025 benchmarks. They vary widely by industry: a law firm pays far more than a restaurant. The key point: a cheaper click on Meta does not mean a cheaper customer, because intent is lower there.
Here is the method I use with my clients, from most important to least:
Both platforms now push their automated campaigns: Performance Max on Google, Advantage+ on Meta. The AI distributes the budget, tests creatives and finds audiences for you. It's powerful, but it isn't magic: without a clearly defined conversion goal, clean tracking and good creative to feed it, the algorithm optimises into a void. AI amplifies a clear strategy, it does not replace one.
Trying to be everywhere at once with a small budget. A small business splitting 600 USD a month across Google, Facebook, Instagram and LinkedIn gets nothing usable anywhere. Each platform has a learning phase that needs a minimum of data. Concentrate the budget where your customer actually is, prove profitability, then expand. It's slower to say, but it's what works.
Meta Ads shows a lower cost per click, often 0.70 to 1.90 USD depending on the objective, versus around 5 USD on average for Google Ads (WordStream 2025 benchmarks). But the cheapest click is not always the most profitable: what matters is the real cost per customer, which depends on intent and conversion rate.
Plan a test budget of roughly 1,000 to 1,500 USD per month per platform for 6 to 8 weeks. That is the realistic minimum to gather enough data, let the algorithm learn and draw reliable conclusions before scaling up.
Expect 2 to 4 weeks of learning before campaigns stabilise, and 6 to 8 weeks before you have a reliable cost per acquisition. The first few days are not representative: the algorithm needs conversions to optimise.
Want to invest your ad budget in the right place in Greater Vancouver?
Book a discovery call